Integrations

Make each Jira worklog a time record you could show the ATO

Jira worklogs can be R&D time records if each is entered on or near the day, by the person who did the work, against the specific issue that holds the experiment, with the issue itself saying what was attempted. The ATO calls timesheets or job cards the most accurate method, and backdated or vague records are not appropriate.

Reviewed by George WalchFacts last verified

What Rand reads

  • Each worklog's author, the date and time the work started and its duration.
  • The issue the time was logged against, with its description and up to 20 of its comments, which say what the time was spent on.

What it becomes in your claim

  • Tracked time for each person, on the date each entry gives for the work, counted as R&D or ordinary work by the decision about the issue.
  • Held entries, each with its reason, for time logged by an unmatched account, on a non-working day or beyond a day's available hours.
  • A flag for the director on any month where logged R&D time exceeds 80% of available hours.

What Rand never does

  • Rand never adds, edits or deletes a worklog or anything else in Jira.
  • No logged hour is claimed until a person has reviewed it and a director has signed the year.

What the ATO accepts as a time record

The ATO says employers must substantiate the time employees spend on eligible R&D, and that timesheets or job cards are the most accurate and effective method. Where timesheets are impractical it accepts a summary sheet if it is as reliable, or a diary for someone whose ratio of R&D work stays fairly constant. Its expenditure guidance adds that salary claims should rest on actual expenditure and records such as time sheets or job cards. It also says records that are backdated or contain non-specific details are not appropriate.

A Jira worklog has most of what a job card needs: a person, a date, a duration and the task. Whether it holds up depends on how it is written and when.

Five habits for usable worklogs

  1. Log on the day. The worklog date should be the day the work happened, entered that day or soon after. Month-end catch-up logging looks backdated even when it is honest.
  2. Log against the experiment, not the epic. Put time on the story, task or spike that holds the hypothesis. An epic usually spans several pieces of work, so time logged there takes more explaining to tie to one experiment, and Rand screens epics out as planning containers.
  3. Let the issue say what was done. A worklog records time; the issue's description and comments record the work. "Ran variant B against the 10M set, recall 0.87" belongs on the issue.
  4. Let each person log their own time where you can. The ATO does not require self-entry, but the record must show whose time it was. Shared or service accounts lose that link, and Rand counts a worklog for the account that logged it.
  5. Log ordinary work too. Support tickets, meetings and routine fixes logged alongside R&D show the whole day and keep the R&D share honest.

Good and weak worklogs (illustrative)

These entries are illustrative.

WeakStronger
40 hours on epic "Search v2", logged 30 June3h on spike ENG-118 "Two-stage retrieval recall test", logged 12 March
8h on "Misc dev" every Friday2h on ENG-121 "Benchmark learned quantisation", plus 1h on SUP-77 "Customer export bug"
A team lead logs the whole team's week under their own accountEach engineer logs their own time on the day
Time logged on a public holiday with no noteA day worked on a public holiday, recorded as a day worked
Issue description empty, worklog comment "work"Issue states the hypothesis; comments record each run and result

What Rand does with worklogs

If you connect Jira, Rand reads the complete worklog ledger for each issue with work in the claim year. For each entry it keeps the author, when the work started and how long it took. It does not keep the worklog comment, so the issue itself needs to say what was done.

Rand's default method estimates R&D time from active days, but worklogs are the one source it treats as tracked time: counted as logged, on the date the entry gives for the work rather than the day it was typed in, as R&D or ordinary work depending on the decision about the issue. Some entries become notices instead of hours:

  • Time logged by a Jira account not yet matched to an employee counts once the account is matched.
  • Time logged on a day outside the person's working days is shown but not counted, unless someone records that they worked that day.
  • A day with more logged time than the person's available hours is held to that day's hours and flagged.
  • Time logged on an epic counts as ordinary work, not R&D, because Rand screens epics out as planning containers.

Logged time is never trimmed to a monthly ceiling. A month above 80% R&D is flagged for the director, who checks it before signing the year's hours with the time allocation schedule. Those signed hours, applied to payroll from Xero, become personnel cost.

For the engineering side of the same experiment, see pull requests as R&D experiment records. The contemporaneous evidence glossary entry and R&D Tax Incentive resources cover the wider rules.

The record keeping requirements guide covers time records alongside other evidence, and what R&D expenditure you can claim explains how hours become salary costs.

Frequently asked questions

Do we have to log every hour in Jira to claim R&D time?
No. The ATO accepts other reasonable records, such as a summary sheet or a diary where timesheets are impractical. Worklogs are simply the most direct record if your team already uses Jira, and partial logging still helps when it is accurate.
Can we log a month of time at the end of the month?
Avoid it. A worklog's date should be the day the work was done, entered close to that day. The ATO says backdated records are not appropriate, and a block of entries made on one day for a whole month reads as one.
Should non-R&D work be logged too?
It helps. Time on ordinary work shows how the rest of the day was spent, which makes the R&D share more credible and stops it being overstated.

Sources

  1. ATO: Keeping records and calculating your notional deductions (appropriate records for salary expenditure)
  2. ATO: Expenditure you can claim (salary expenditure)
  3. business.gov.au: Record keeping for the R&D Tax Incentive

The R&D Tax Incentive is a self-assessment program. This page is general information, not tax, legal or financial advice; eligibility depends on your circumstances and you should seek independent advice for them.